|
Homepage | Sexual Health
See also: Birth Control, STDs
College Students Face Soaring Birth Control Prices
An Associated Press article on MSNBC says prices for birth control pills are doubling and tripling on college campuses. Hugh Jessop, executive director of the health center at Indiana University, told MSNBC that it was a "tremendous problem" for students.
There, he said, women are paying about $22 per month for prescriptions that cost $10 a few months ago. "Some of our students have two jobs, have children," Jessop said. "To increase this by 100 percent or more overnight, which is what happened, is a huge shock to them and to their system."
At some schools women could see prices rise several hundred dollars per year.
About 39 percent of undergraduate women use oral contraceptives, according to an estimate by the American College Health Association based on survey data.
Many students could shift to generics but experts said they might still pay twice the previous rate.
"It's terrible, because these are students who are working very hard to pay for their tuition and books at a time when tuition costs are edging up as well," said Linda Lekawski, director of the university health center at Texas A&M, where the old price for birth control pills of about $15 per month is expected to triple. "This is one thing they've been able to benefit from for years."
The prices are rapidly increasing becasue of President Bush's Deficit Reduction Act Of 2005 bill from 2005. The bill cut into programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. This article which says some students may be paying four or five times the amount they used to for birth control pills explains how the bill thwarted student medical centers from purchasing pills in bulk for their students.
Before the act, pharmaceutical companies supplied the medications to certain health care providers such as universities and public clinics at a heavily discounted price. Now, the incentives for the companies to offer the drugs at the lower prices have been eliminated and without them the companies have removed the discounts rather than maintaining the lower price and taking the loss.
Posted on May 25, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Men and Women Tend to Overestimate the Dating Competition
The Economist, which seems an unlikely source for such an article, reports that a behavior study has found that men and women tend to overestimate how attractive the competition is.
IF YOU have ever sat alone in a bar, depressed by how good-looking everybody else seems to be, take comfort-it may be evolution playing a trick on you. A study just published in Evolution and Human Behavior by Sarah Hill, a psychologist at the University of Texas, Austin, shows that people of both sexes reckon the sexual competition they face is stronger than it really is. She thinks that is useful: it makes people try harder to attract or keep a mate.
Dr Hill showed heterosexual men and women photographs of people. She asked them to rate both how attractive those of their own sex would be to the opposite sex, and how attractive the members of the opposite sex were. She then compared the scores for the former with the scores for the latter, seen from the other side. Men thought that the men they were shown were more attractive to women than they really were, and women thought the same of the women.
Dr Hill had predicted this outcome, thanks to error-management theory-the idea that when people (or, indeed, other animals) make errors of judgment, they tend to make the error that is least costly. The notion was first proposed by Martie Haselton and David Buss, two of Dr Hill's colleagues, to explain a puzzling quirk in male psychology.
Maybe this study will make a few people feel better but if it is a natural thing to do that confidence boost may be short-lived. It may be impossible to completely override this impulse to give your competition a higher rank than they deserve once you are out in the real world. There is also an exception to this study -- those arrogant persons who seem to think they are hottest guy or girl at the party no matter what reality shows.
Posted on November 10, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Scientists Working on Male Contraceptive Drug
WebMD reports that scientists have made some progress in rats with Adjudin, a drug that has the potential to act as a male contraceptive. WebMD's article says recent lab test on rats showed no signs of side effects and that the effects of the drug wore off in 20 weeks.
Basically, Adjudin nips wannabe sperm cells in the bud. Those cells, called germ cells, ordinarily develop into sperm. But they need the help of other cells, called Sertoli cells, to reach that destiny.
Adjudin interferes with the process.
Cheng's team previously reported from other animal tests that Adjudin, given orally by itself, was too toxic to be a suitable contraceptive because it caused liver inflammation and muscle shrinkage (atrophy).
So the scientists bundled Adjudin with a synthetic version of the sex hormone FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone) and injected it into the bellies of four male rats.
A male contraceptive pill that had no side effects and could last for months would be a major breakthrough. There will have to be considerable testing of this drug to make sure there will be no side effects -- like the liver inflammation and muscle shrinkage mentioned above.
Posted on November 3, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study Links Cell Phone Use to Male Infertility
The Daily Mail reports that a recent study of cell phone users could mean that men who use cell phones are at an increased risk of infertility. The study found that men who use cell phones for over four hours a day had a 25% lower sperm count.
US researchers in Cleveland and New Orleans, and doctors in Mumbai, India, looked at more than 360 men undergoing checks at a fertility clinic who were classified into three groups according to their sperm count.
Men who used a mobile for more than four hours a day had a 25 per cent lower sperm count than men who never used a mobile.
The men with highest usage also had greater problems with sperm quality, with the swimming ability of sperm - a crucial factor in conception - down by a third.
They had a 50 per cent drop in the number of properly formed sperm, with just one-fifth looking normal under a microscope.
Professor Ashok Agarwal, director of the Reproductive Research Centre at the Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, who led the study, said "Almost a billion people are using cell phones around the world and the number is growing in many countries at 20 to 30 per cent a year.
The findings are alarming but a much broader and larger study will be need to verify the results. Four hours of cell phone use per day is also a considerable amount of cell phone use but apparently not uncommon since 114 of the 360 men in the study use their cell phones for four hours or more daily.
Posted on October 25, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
|