|
Homepage | Politics
Former Surgeon General Blasts Bush Administration
The IHT reports that former Surgeon General Dr. Richard Carmona testified to a congressional panel that the Bush administration blocked him about speaking on certain subjects such as birth control and stem cells.Carmona said the Bush administration even discouraged him from attending the Special Olympics. He also said they delayed and tried to weaken a report on secondhand smoke.
The administration, Carmona said Tuesday, would not allow him to speak or issue reports on the subjects of stem cells, emergency contraception, sex education or prison, mental or global health issues. Top officials tried to "water down" a landmark report on secondhand smoke and delayed it for years, he said. Released last year, the report concluded that even brief exposure to cigarette smoke can cause immediate harm.
Carmona said he was ordered to mention President George W. Bush three times on every page of his speeches. He also said he was asked to make speeches to support Republican political candidates and to attend political briefings.
Administration officials even discouraged him from attending the Special Olympics because, he said, of that charitable organization's longtime ties to a "prominent family" that he declined to name. "I was specifically told by a senior person, 'Why would you want to help those people?' " Carmona said.
The Special Olympics is one of the nation's premier charitable organizations to benefit disabled people, and the Kennedy family has long been deeply involved in it. When asked after the hearing whether that "prominent family" was the Kennedys, Carmona responded, "You said it. I didn't."
It is horrible to learn that the Bush administration has been putting ideaology and big business ahead of public safety. This is just not acceptable. The public deserves to know everything our Surgeon General wants to report. Information should not be stifled over politics.
Posted on July 11, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Bush Vetoes Promising Stem Cell Bill
President George Bush used his very first veto since taking office six years ago to veto a very important stem cell bill that could have opened up federal funding for stem cell research. Many politicians against embryonic stem cell research are unable to explain why they are not also against in-vitro fertilization. Both embryonic stem cell research and in-vitro fertilization require the destruction of embryos. The Media Cynic reports that most people are in favor of embryonic stem cell research.
Polls consistently show that a majority of Americans want federal funding for stem cell research and they want it now, not later. But President Bush appears determined to make sure that America falls behind the rest of the world in scientific advances. Japan, for one, is already way ahead of us on this issue which could potentially provide a cure for diabetes, some cancers, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.
The Media Cynic also provided a link to a good Chicago Tribune article that debunks the idea that adult stem cells are as good as embryonic stem cells. The Embryonic Stem Cell Research Lab at UW Madison says embryonic stem cells have the potential to treat or cure diseases like Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, spinal cord injuries and burns. A faq on their site also says the research will also be useful discovering new drugs.
Posted on July 24, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
New Bill Would Gut Women's Healthcare Coverage
The Media Cynic reports on the new HIMMAA bill that would allow health insurance companies to drop coverage for several women's health procedures and health needs. The Media Cynic says the bill will override state law protections that require health insurance companies to continue covering women's healthcare items and procedures including annual cervical cancer exams and contraception. The bill also requires women to go to a primary care doctor first and not directly to an ob/gyn. The Cynic explains why passing this bill would be a huge mistake.
The arrogance of these lawmakers is simply breathtaking. Women have fought for years for these protections, such as not being forced to change doctors mid-pregnancy just because her doctor is dropped from her insurance plan. If insurance doesn't cover screenings for routine cervical cancer exams, many women won't have them. Most women use their OB/GYN as their primary doctor, relying her to get the correct care and screenings for everything from cancer to osteoporosis: women will have to go to another gateway doctor first before they can get to their OB/GYN under most insurance plans. And the law is so broadly written that many more procedures won't be required to be covered.
The Senate should not pass this awful and unfair bill.
Posted on March 13, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Uganda Blames U.S. Policy for Harming AIDS Battle
The Uganda government is blaming the Bush administration for harming the countries battle against the deadly AIDs disease. The BBC also says Uganda is suffering from a condom shortage.
"At the moment, the government of Uganda appears to be under the influence of the American policy through the presidential initiative of emphasising abstinence far and away over condoms," he said.
He suggested US President George Bush, who launched his multi-billion dollar campaign to tackle Aids in Africa two years ago, was acting under the influence of the religious right in US.
A senior US official rejected Mr Lewis's criticism, saying the current administration supported condom use as part of a balanced programme that included prevention.
"The statements that I have heard are completely untrue and completely mischaracterise effective prevention programmes," Mark Dybul, deputy US global Aids co-ordinator told Reuters news agency.
This is not the first time the Bush administration has been accused of supporting abstinence instead of condom use. The Bush administration has also been blamed for refusing to give money to the the UN Population Fund (UNFD) which helps with education, family planning and condom use in an effort to reduce the out-of-control population growth in third world countries. A 2004 Boston Globe article has more about the Bush Administration continued refusal to give money to the UNFD. Abstinence will not help reduce birth rates. It takes education and birth control to control population growth.
Posted on August 30, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
NIH Review Finds Widespread Ethics Violations
Bloomberg.com reports that forty four National Institutes of Health (NIH) scientists violated government regulations about keeping outside contracts with pharmaceutical industry. Bloomberg also reports that nine of the scientists may be investigated for criminal violations.
The NIH review suggested the agency's ethics issues are widespread, the lawmakers said in a statement. A Congressional inquiry last year uncovered potential conflicts of interest among senior NIH scientists, as many supplemented their incomes with thousands of dollars from consulting contracts with companies including Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drugmaker.
``These findings indicate that the ethical problems are more systemic and severe than previously known,'' Barton said in the news release. ``They also demonstrate the need for NIH to issue the final ethics rule as soon as possible.''
The Bloomberg.com article says that Pfizer's contracts with the scientists range from $500 to more than $500,000 over a five-year period. Obviously, you can't have a fair evalution of drugs while a scientist is also being paid by the company that makes the drugs.
Posted on July 14, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study: 27% Believe Drug Companies Hiding Cancer Cure
Dr. Koop reports on a new study that indicates some Americans distrust the drug companies. According to the survey 27% of Americans believe that a cancer cure already exists but the health industry is hiding it. 41% believe that the surgical treatments used to cure cancer actually spread the disease. And 89% disagreed with the statement that "all you need to beat cancer is a positive attitude." Dr. Ray DuBois, director of the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tenn, told Dr. Koop that drug companies are not hiding a cancer cure.
Most surprising, he said, was the widespread belief that the medical industry is hiding a cure. "It's just the reverse," DuBois said, noting that companies are trying to fast-track new drugs and treatments to get them to people as soon as possible.
The survey results, said DuBois, probably mean that cancer centers should "beef up their public education efforts." He noted, "There are more misconceptions out there than some people realize."
Posted on June 27, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
|