Health News Blog
HealthNewsBlog.com
Homepage
Health Web Search
Linking to Us
Medical Terms Search
Our Blogs
RSS Feed
WWFeeds.com


Text Ads




Add to MyYahoo

Add to MyMSN

Add to Bloglines

Add to NewsGator

Add to Google





Categories
Addictions
AIDS
Allergies and Asthma
Alternative Medicine
Alzheimers and Dimensia
Baby Health
Bird Flu
Birth Control
Blood
Bones
Brain
Breast Cancer
Cancer
Cell Phones
Children's Health
Coffee and Tea
Cryotherapy
Death and Dying
Dental Health
Diabetes
Diagnostic Procedures
Diet
Digestive System
Diseases
Drug Resistant Bacteria
Drugs and Medication
Environment
Eyes
First Aid
Fitness
Food
Genetics
Government
Hair
Hands and Feet
Health Insurance
Healthy Living
Hearing
Heart
Heat
Holidays
Hurricane Katrina
Hygiene
Industry News
Influenza/Flu
Insects
Internet Resources
Longevity
Love
Mad Cow
Medical Gadgets
Meditation
Melanoma
Men's Health
Mental Health
Miscellaneous
Nursing
Nutrition
Occupational Health
Pain
Pet Health
Phobias
Politics
Pregnancy
Psychology
Recalls
Repetitive Strain Injury
Respiratory Health
Safety
Seniors
Sexual Health
Skin
Sleeping
Smoking
Sports Medicine
STDs
Stem Cells
Stress
Stroke
Surgery
Technology
Toxins
Transplants
Vaccines
Weather and Health
Weight Loss/Obesity
West Nile Virus
Women's Health
WTC Responders


Our Blogs
Bloggers Blog
Crafters Craft
Drivers Drive
Fantasy SF Blog
Gamers Game
Health News Blog
HowToWeb.com
The IWJ Blog
Lovers Love
Media Cynic
Petosphere
Pleasant Morning Buzz
Readers Read
Science News Blog
Shopping Blog
Singers Sing
Surfers Surf
Traders Trade
Video Nacho
Watchers Watch
Workers Work
The Write News
Writer's Blog








Homepage | Government

FDA: Cloned Animals OK For Human Consumption

The FDA says clones are ok to eat. The FDA's food safety chief Dr. Stephen Sundlof said that they "found nothing in the food that could potentially be hazardous. The food in every respect is indistinguishable from food from any other animal." The Associated Press reports that two companies have alread produced over 600 cloned animals for U.S. breeders.
The two main U.S. cloning companies, Viagen Inc. and Trans Ova Genetics, already have produced more than 600 cloned animals for U.S. breeders, including copies of prize-winning cows and rodeo bulls. They agreed to USDA's call for a continued moratorium Tuesday, but stressed that it applied only to clones themselves, not those animals' conventionally produced offspring, which can begin selling immediately.

The FDA spent six years tracking the safety of cloning, and its decision was long expected, but it came after an emotional fight by opponents. Congress passed legislation last month urging further study of the issue, a call echoed by consumer advocates who also asked that foods from cloned animals be labeled as such.

Their objections aren't just about food safety but also include animal welfare since many attempts at livestock cloning still end in fatal birth defects.

"If you have moral objections to a particular food, or ethical objections to them, FDA's saying, 'Tough, you've got to eat it,'" said Carol Tucker-Foreman of the Consumer Federation of America, who pledged to push for more food producers to shun clone-derived ingredients.

"The FDA did not give adequate consideration to the welfare of these animals or their surrogate mothers," said Wayne Pacelle of the Humane Society of the United States.
The FDA also said, "It is beyond our imagination to even find a theory that would cause the food to be unsafe." There are many that disagree with the FDA and would argue that the FDA is not being nearly imaginative enough. Six years does not seem like enough time to make a decision. This is something new that we are very unfamiliar with. It may very well turn out that cloned animals are no less nutritious and healthy for humans to eat than non-cloned animals but could a few more years of tests really hurt?

Posted on January 16, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



Former Surgeon General Blasts Bush Administration

The IHT reports that former Surgeon General Dr. Richard Carmona testified to a congressional panel that the Bush administration blocked him about speaking on certain subjects such as birth control and stem cells.Carmona said the Bush administration even discouraged him from attending the Special Olympics. He also said they delayed and tried to weaken a report on secondhand smoke.
The administration, Carmona said Tuesday, would not allow him to speak or issue reports on the subjects of stem cells, emergency contraception, sex education or prison, mental or global health issues. Top officials tried to "water down" a landmark report on secondhand smoke and delayed it for years, he said. Released last year, the report concluded that even brief exposure to cigarette smoke can cause immediate harm.

Carmona said he was ordered to mention President George W. Bush three times on every page of his speeches. He also said he was asked to make speeches to support Republican political candidates and to attend political briefings.

Administration officials even discouraged him from attending the Special Olympics because, he said, of that charitable organization's longtime ties to a "prominent family" that he declined to name. "I was specifically told by a senior person, 'Why would you want to help those people?' " Carmona said.

The Special Olympics is one of the nation's premier charitable organizations to benefit disabled people, and the Kennedy family has long been deeply involved in it. When asked after the hearing whether that "prominent family" was the Kennedys, Carmona responded, "You said it. I didn't."
It is horrible to learn that the Bush administration has been putting ideaology and big business ahead of public safety. This is just not acceptable. The public deserves to know everything our Surgeon General wants to report. Information should not be stifled over politics.

Posted on July 11, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

CDC Categorizes Flu Epidemics Like Hurricanes

Pandemic Severity IndexThe CDC is now categorizing flu epidemics as Category 1 through 5 just like hurricanes are categorized. A Cat 5 flu would be far more devastating than a Cat 5hurricane. It would leave 1.8 million dead and it would shut down major cities for months. The new categories are part of a Pandemic Severity Index released as part of a new comprehensive strategy to deal with a severe influenza outbreak. You can see the Pandemic Severity Index graph on the right.

You can see the new Community Strategy for Pandemic Influenza Mitigation from the government here on the PandemicFlu.gov website. The plan was developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in collaboration with other Federal agencies and partners in the public health, education, business, healthcare, and private sectors.

The New York Times has a report on the new guidelines. The Times says it was partly based on the response to the 1918 epidemic.
Today's guidelines are partly based on a recent study of how 44 cities fared in the 1918 epidemic conducted jointly by the C.D.C. and the University of Michigan’s medical school. Historians and epidemiologists pored over hospital records and newspaper clippings, trying to determine what factors partly spared some cities and doomed others.

While a few tiny towns escaped the epidemic entirely by cutting off all contact with outside, most cities took less drastic measures. These included isolating the sick and quarantining homes and rooming houses, closing schools, churches, bars and other gathering places, canceling parades, ball games, theaters and other public events, staggering factory hours, barring door-to-door sales, discouraging the use of public transport and encouraging the use of face masks.

The most effective measure seemed to be moving early and quickly. For example, said Dr. Howard Markel, a medical historian and one of the study's leaders, Philadelphia, the worst-hit city, had nearly three times as many sick and dead per capita as St. Louis, which had was hit weeks later by the virus moving inland from the Eastern Seaboard and had time to react as soon as flu cases rose above averages.

"No matter how you set up the model," Dr. Markel said, "the cities that acted earlier and with more layered protective measures fared better."
In oder to prepare early it will also be crucial that local governments have access to all the information they need. In other words, the federal government needs to rapidly share information with local governments so they can prepare as quickly as possible.

Posted on February 1, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



FDA Considering Drug Report Cards

The FDA is considering issuing drug report cards that inform the public about problems with drugs and drug side effects. This would be for drugs that the FDA has already approved. MSNBC.com reports the FDA is looking for new ideas following the "public outcry over the withdrawal of the painkiller Vioxx."
As part of a pilot program, the Food and Drug Administration will issue drug “report cards” that would detail unexpected side effects that emerge only after a drug has been approved. The reports also would include follow-up studies and details about how the drugs are being used.

The proposal is one of roughly a dozen initiatives, new and ongoing, that the FDA unveiled Tuesday in response to a recent report by a committee of experts at the Institute of Medicine that criticized the agency's handling of drug safety in the wake of the Vioxx case.

It comes just days before Sens. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., introduce legislation to overhaul how the FDA handles drug safety.

"Today's report is thoughtful and provides important recommendations for administrative action, but only legislation can give FDA the tools it needs to ensure that FDA is the gold standard for safety," Kennedy said in a statement.
The drug report cards are something the FDA is considering but nothing has been decided. The Associated Press says the FDA did say it will "publish newsletters to summarize its safety reviews of older drugs and disclose emerging issues." You can find drug information currently on the FDA's website on this webpage. Each drug has a Drug Information Page. For example, the page for Aciphex can be found here. It includes information about the drug as well as a date indicated when the information was last updated.

Posted on January 30, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

New Food Labels to Alert People With Allergies

On January 1st a new law (2004 Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act) will go into affect requiring food labels to list any ingredients made from the following foods: milk, eggs, fish, crustaceans, wheat, tree nuts, soybeans and peanuts. These eight foods account for 90 percent of all food allergies according to the FDA.
"The eight major food allergens account for 90 percent of all documented food allergic reactions, and some reactions may be severe or life-threatening," said Robert E. Brackett, PhD, Director of FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. "Consumers will benefit from improved food labels for products that contain food allergens."
The FDA news release about the new labels says 30,000 Americans enter the emergency room and 150 people die each year because of food allergies. An MSNBC.com article says an FDA study in 1999 sound many foods containing allergies were not properly labeled.
A 1999 FDA study in Minnesota and Wisconsin found a quarter of the baked goods, ice cream and candy its scientists sampled failed to list peanuts or eggs as ingredients.

Food labels must now list the common name of the product as well as the name of the specific allergen it contains. A product containing a protein derived from milk called casein, for example, must list both "milk" and "casein" on its label. Labels also must specify the type of fish, crustacean or tree nut the product contains.
This specific allergen information will be a great help to people that suffer from allergies. When it comes to food the policy should be the more information the better for consumers.

Posted on December 20, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



NIH Review Finds Widespread Ethics Violations

Bloomberg.com reports that forty four National Institutes of Health (NIH) scientists violated government regulations about keeping outside contracts with pharmaceutical industry. Bloomberg also reports that nine of the scientists may be investigated for criminal violations.
The NIH review suggested the agency's ethics issues are widespread, the lawmakers said in a statement. A Congressional inquiry last year uncovered potential conflicts of interest among senior NIH scientists, as many supplemented their incomes with thousands of dollars from consulting contracts with companies including Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drugmaker.

``These findings indicate that the ethical problems are more systemic and severe than previously known,'' Barton said in the news release. ``They also demonstrate the need for NIH to issue the final ethics rule as soon as possible.''
The Bloomberg.com article says that Pfizer's contracts with the scientists range from $500 to more than $500,000 over a five-year period. Obviously, you can't have a fair evalution of drugs while a scientist is also being paid by the company that makes the drugs.

Posted on July 14, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati


www.healthnewsblog.com

Copyright © 2005-2007 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.