|
Homepage | Cancer
See also: Breast Cancer, Melanoma
Antidepressants May Help Body Fight Cancer, HIV
The Independent reports that new research published in inBiological Psychiatry indicates some antidepressants may help they body fight HIV, cancer and other infections.
Natural killer (NK) cells are white blood cells which home in on infected or cancerous cells, releasing agents that induce apoptosis, or "cell suicide". NK cells are especially active against viruses.
The research emerged from findings that stress and depression impair NK cell function and can accelerate the progress of HIV/ Aids. Scientists recruited depressed and non-depressed HIV-positive women and treated them with three drugs to treat stress and depression. Two, Citalopram and the "substance P antagonist" CP-96345 increased NK cell activity, while RU486 had no effect.
The Independent article also contained the following quote from the leader of the research team, Dr Dwight Evans of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia: "The findings show that natural killer cell function in HIV infection may be enhanced by selective serotonin re-uptake inhibition and substance P antagonism."
It sounds promising. If additional research supports the theory it is possible more people suffering from HIV and/or cancer will also be put on an antidepressant. Many cancer patients already are because it helps with chronic pain management.
Posted on May 12, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Bone Marrow Transplant Hope For Leukaemia Patients
A bone marrow transplant technique might be a life-saving treatment for some leukaemia patients reports the BBC. Cells in the newly transplanted bone marrow may help to kill the leukameia cells.
Some leukaemia patients who do not respond to conventional treatments may benefit from bone marrow transplants selected to target the cancer directly.
The technique, pioneered in Italy, uses transplants from family members who are not a perfect match.
"Natural killer" cells in the new bone marrow then attack the leukaemia.
Survival rates rose after the treatment, but UK experts say these need to be reproduced on a bigger scale and in different types of the disease.
Finding a donor is difficult because of rejection. Doctors have to look for a donor within the patient's family and even then they might not be able to find a match. About a third of the population will never be able to use the technique. However, it is an important breakthrough that will need to be vetted with more trials - it could be a livesaver for some lucky enough to find a donor. A spokesperson for the Leukaemia Research Fund said, "If you are in the position of a patient who has not responded to treatment, the choice between a 2% chance of survival and a 30% chance is not a difficult one."
Posted on April 11, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study Downplays Some Cancer Risks
University of New South Wales Professor Bernard Stewart recently conducted a study on cancer risk factors. According to MSNBC Stewart found that smoking and alcohol are both high risk factors. On the plus side Stewart study downplays the cancer risk from coffee, deodorants, fluoridated water and having breast implants or dental fillings. Stewart also downplays cell phone risks.
He found active smokers and ex-smokers to be the most at risk, although the risk is reduced for people who quit smoking.
Drinking alcohol was also a high risk factor, particularly for people who also smoke, although Stewart said no specific type of alcoholic drink was most strongly to blame.
Drinking chlorinated water and using a mobile phone was far less likely to cause cancer, Stewart said, although the risks associated with the long-term use of mobile phones had not been fully established.
He said there little risk from drinking coffee, using deodorants, drinking fluoridated water and having breast implants or dental fillings.
Stewart says his tool helps "establish if the level of risk is high, say on a par with smoking, or unlikely such as using deodorants, artificial sweeteners, drinking coffee." His research was published in the Mutation Research Reviews journal. You can read a little more about his research here on ScienceAlert.com.au.
Posted on February 11, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Implanted Microchips Linked to Tumors in Lab Mice
ABC reports that microchips already approved for human and pet use have induced tumors in lab mice and rats. The FDA apparently decided the public didn't need this information at the time they approved the microchips.
Those chips are now being implanted in some people, especially Alzheimer's patients, and encoded with their medical records. The Food and Drug Administration called the microchip one of 2005's top innovative technologies.
The microchips have been implanted in hundreds of people like Ida Frankel, who has Alzheimer's disease. If she gets lost and ends up in a hospital, doctors can scan her arm and get all of her medical records.
But when the government approved these chips for use in humans three years ago, it didn't mention that there were studies showing that similar chips caused malignant tumors in lab rats and mice.
Cancer doctors who spoke to The Associated Press, which broke this story, say you can't make the leap between cancer in mice and cancer in humans.
Some are dismissing the link between microchips and mice as inconsequential but it would have been nice if this information had been made available to the public before the FDA had approved the microchips. The fact that the FDA is standing by their decision is a little odd. Why wouldn't they have at least wanted more testing to be done before saying this chips are ok for humans and pets? Dr. Robert Benezra, the head of the Cancer Biology Genetics Program at Sloan-Kettering Hospital, told ABC News that, "There's no way in the world, having read this information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my skin." Meanwhile, VeriChip Corp. has issued a statement defending the technology.
This is really bad news for such a potentially useful technology. It isn't good news for pet owners as well. Many pets get microchips and the news is going to make the decision to chip your pet that much more complicated. Obviously, it is going to make the decision to microchip your parent who is suffering from alzheimer's much more complex as well. It is a real shame because microchips would be very useful if they could be proven to not induce tumors in people and in animals.
Posted on September 10, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
New Technology Kills Tumors With Electric Fields
Technology Review reports that an Isreali company called NovoCure is testing a new cancer fighting weapon that uses a weak electric fields to destroy cancer cells. The article says the process has destroyed every type of cancer cell in animal tests. Studies are being done on breast cancer in Europe and on glioblastoma, a deadly brain cancer in the U.S. and Europe. The technology works because cancer cells divide more quickly and have a different shape than normal cells. This feature of cancer cells allows them to be destroyed by the electric field while normal cells survive unscathed.
The electric fields' different effects on normal and dividing cells mostly have to do with geometry. A dividing cell has what Palti calls "an hourglass shape rather than a round shape." The electric field generated by the NovoCure device passes around and through round cells in a uniform fashion. But the narrow neck that pinches in at the center of a dividing cell acts like a lens, concentrating the electric field at this point. This non-uniform electric field wreaks havoc on dividing cells. The electric field tears apart important biological molecules, such as DNA and the structural proteins that pull the chromosomes into place during cell division. Dividing cells simply "disintegrate," says Palti.
Palti, who for years has been studying the effect of electric fields on cancer and normal cells, says that he has verified this mechanism in computer models and experiments in the lab. "The physics are solid," says David Cohen, associate professor of radiology at Harvard Medical School.
Patients in the glioblastoma clinical trial wear the device almost constantly, carrying necessary components in a briefcase. A wire emerging from the briefcase connects to adhesive electrodes covering the skull. Alternating electric fields pass through the scalp, into the skull, and on to the brain. The Food and Drug Administration approved the device for late-stage clinical trials for glioblastoma following promising results from a pilot study in 10 patients, one of whom had a complete recovery.
There is some equipment patients have to carry with them but no one is going to mind having to lug around equipment if it will cure them of their deadly cancer. You can see a video of a presentation by Mike Ambrogi of NovoCure to the Central New Jersey Brain Tumor Support Group here.
Posted on August 8, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Long-Term Study of Cancer and Cell Phones Ordered
The Times Online reports that a mass study of 200,000 cell phones users will look at the possibility of a long-term cancer risk from cell phone use.
More than 200,000 volunteers, including long-term users, are to be monitored for at least five years to plot mobile phone use against any serious diseases they develop, including cancer and Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases.
Professor Lawrie Challis, who is in the final stages of negotiation with the Department of Health and the mobile phone industry for the &3 million that he needs to fund the study, told The Times that research has shown that mobiles are very safe in the short term but that there is a "hint of something" for people using them longer.
In an interview, Professor Challis, a world expert on mobile phone radiation, and chairman of the government-funded mobile telecommunications health research programme, emphasised that the "hint" was just that. One European study has found a slight association and using a mobile for more than ten years. The few long-term users developed more acoustic neuroma brain tumours which were found close to the ear used for phoning.
But, because of the tiny numbers involved, "it could be by chance," he said. Asked whether the mobile phone could turn out to be the cigarette of the 21st century in terms of the damage it could inflict, he replied: "Absolutely."
Challis told the Times that the reason a long-term study is needed is because it sometimes takes a decade or longer for a cancer to develop from exposure to radiation or a toxin.
He said that the study was necessary because all the important breakthroughs in what caused cancers had shown that the effects often took more than ten years to show. "You find absolutely nothing for ten years and then after that it starts to grow dramatically. It goes up ten times. You look at what happened after the atomic bombs at Nagasaki, Hiroshima. You find again a long delay, nothing for ten years. The same for asbestos."
Hopefully, these new studies will show that cell phones do not result in a higher likelihood of tumor growth but if cell phones do increase cancer risk we will all want to know. Past studies on cell phones have hinted at possible links to benign acoustic neuromas and lower sperm counts but a Danish long-term study disputed a cancer link. The Times article includes a helpful roundup of some past cell phones studies at the bottom of the article. CNET has an interesting chart that shows the cell phones with the highest radiation levels. Whether or not you fear cancer caused from cell phone radiation you should still make sure your cell phone is not dirtier than a toilet seat.
Posted on January 20, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Elastrography Can Instantly Identify Breast Cancer
MSNBC.com reports that experimental ultrasound technology called elastography has been very successful in early trials at locating cancer. Elastrography is able to instantly indicate whether a breast lump is cancer or a benign lesion.
An experimental ultrasound technique that measures how easily breast lumps compress and bounce back could enable doctors to determine instantly whether a woman has cancer or not without doing a biopsy.
In a small study of 80 women, the technique -- called "elastography" -- distinguished harmless lumps from malignant ones with nearly 100 percent accuracy.
If the results hold up in a larger study, elastography could save thousands of women from the waiting, cost, discomfort and anxiety of a biopsy, in which cells are removed from the breast -- sometimes with a needle, sometimes with a scalpel -- and examined under a microscope.
The article says that of the 1 million biopses performed on breast lump each year about 80% of them turn out to be benign. This causes women a great deal of stess and fear and wastes a lot of time and money simply because today's technology is not perfect.
"There's a lot of anxiety, a lot of stress, a lot of fear involved" with biopsies, said Susan Brown, manager of health education for the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. "And there's the cost of leaving work to make a second appointment. If this can be done instead of a biopsy, there would be a real cost reduction."
Here's how Jonathan Ophir, one of the pioneers of the test, explains the technology.
To explain elastography, Ophir likens the body to a box-spring mattress, but "a crazy mattress made out of millions of small springs and each one is a little different. Each is moving around at a different rate, depending on their individual stiffness." Cancerous tumors are like stiff springs. Normal tissue and benign lesions compress more easily.
The article cited some doctors that believe elastrography will be used in the future but that biopses will probably continue both for legal reasons and because doctors don't want to miss diagnosing a possible cancerous tumor. You can read more about elastrograhy on elastrography.com.
Posted on December 8, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Chemo Drugs Damage Brain Cells
The BBC reports that new studies have shown that healthy brain cells are very vulnerable to chemo drugs.
Drug therapy for cancer can prompt a wide range of neurological side effects, even the onset of dementia.
But they were thought not to be directly linked to the drug treatment itself.
Instead, some doctors have put them down to the patient's vulnerable psychological state.
The latest study found that dose levels typically used when treating patients killed 40% to 80% of cancer cells - but 70% to 100% of human brain cells grown in the lab, and caused serious damage to brain cells when given to mice.
Several types of healthy brain cell continued to die for at least six weeks after exposure.
It is very unfortunate that there are not better ways to kill tumors than by using harmful chemotherapy drugs. At least doctors won't think their parents are crazy anymore when they claim about memory loss and other brain-related problems. On the positive side maybe this will lead to less harmful drugs or some kind of method to protect the brain when the body is undergoing chemotherapy.
Posted on December 6, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
WHO Report Says 60,000 Deaths From UVR Exposure
A report from the World Health Organization called Global Burden of Disease of Solar Ultraviolet Radiation says 60,000 deaths each year are caused by too much exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Of the 60,000 deaths, an estimated 48,000 are caused by malignant melanomas, and 12,000 by skin carcinomas. Information provided by the WHO says there are several cancers and conditions that are caused by UVR exposure. Here is a list of the cancers.
Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM): Melanoma of the skin is a
malignant cancer of great severity. Although treatment is improving,
melanoma still carries a significant risk of death. Between 50% and
90% of the burden of disease from melanoma estimated in the WHO
report is due to UVR exposure.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (SCC): This is another type of
malignant skin cancer which generally progresses less rapidly than
melanoma and is less likely to cause death or ongoing disability.
Of the total SCC disease burden, 50-70% is attributable to UVR
exposure.
Basal cell carcinoma of the skin (BCC): This skin cancer appears
predominantly in older people and grows slowly by local spread. The
incidence and mortality of BCC were estimated to be 50-90%
attributable to UVR exposure.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the cornea or conjunctiva (SCCC): This is
a rare tumour of the surface of the eye. Some 50-70% of the disease
burden due to SCCC is attributable to UVR exposure.
The following are conditions listed by the UN as consequence of excess UVR.
Photoageing: Chronic sun damage is associated with the development
of skin conditions called solar keratoses. On rare occasions, these
are pre-malignant conditions. The burden of disease due to solar
keratoses is 100% attributable to UVR exposure.
Sunburn: Sunburns may be severe and blistering, and the resulting
disease burden is 100% attributable to UVR exposure.
Cortical cataract: Cataract is an eye disease where the lens becomes
increasingly opaque, resulting in impaired vision and eventual
blindness. Long-term sun exposure to the eye increases the risk of
developing a specific cataract type called cortical cataract. Five
percent of all cataract-related disease burden is directly
attributable to UVR exposure.
Pterygium: This is a wing-shaped fleshy growth on the surface of the
eye. 40-70% of the disease burden is attributable to UVR exposure.
Reactivation of herpes of the lip (RHL): Excessive UVR exposure
causes immunosuppression and reactivation of the herpes simplex
virus ("cold sores"). 25-50% of the disease burden is attributable
to UV exposure.
WHO also provides information the UV Index, a measure of the level of UV radiation. The above conditions and diseases are greate reasons to stay out of the sun. If the threat of skin cancer isn't motivation enough for people to stay out of the sun the WHO report also noted that photoageing is a result of too much UVR exposure.
Posted on August 1, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study: Pomegranate Juice Lowers Prostate Risk
A new study has found that drinking pomegranate juice may be beneficial to men. The BBC reports on the study which found pomegranate juice slows prostate growth and reduces PSA numbers.
Pomegranates contain a cocktail of chemicals which minimise cell damage, and potentially kill off cancer cells.
The study, by the University of California in Los Angeles, appears in the journal Clinical Cancer Research.
Previous research had indicated that pomegranate juice could have a beneficial effect on prostate cancer in tests on mice.
But the latest study has shown that humans can potentially benefit too.
Fighting prostate cancer is just one of the many possible benefits of pomegranates. It has also been linked to other benefits. They contain anti-oxidants and isoflavones. This may be why pomegranates are also a hot shopping trend.
Posted on July 11, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
First Cancer-Free Designer Baby in Britain
A new baby in England will be born without the inherited cancer gene found in her mother. The Times Online reports that doctors used a genetic-screening technology to keep a hereditary form of eye cancer from passing to the child from the mother.
Although they did not have fertility problems, the woman and her partner created embryos by IVF. This allowed doctors to remove a cell and test it for the cancer gene, so only unaffected embryos were transferred to her womb.
The couple are the first to take advantage of a relaxation in the rules governing embryo screening.
When the technique was developed in 1989 it was allowed only for genes that always cause disease, such as those for cystic fibrosis. However, it was approved last year for the eye cancer, which affects only 90 per cent of those who inherit a mutated gene.
The pregnancy will increase controversy over the procedure, which the Government’s fertility watchdog authorised on Wednesday for genes that confer an 80 per cent lifetime risk of breast and bowel cancer.
Eventually these types procedures will be common to insure that newborns do not possess hereditary cancers. The ethical concerns are that you will end up with a situation like that portrayed in the movie Gattaca where genetic engineering is used to predetermine everything about the child even issues like hair and eye color. The Times Online article says there are also concerns from religious groups concerned about the embryos that are destroyed in the screening procedure.
Posted on May 15, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Skin Cancer Epedimic in U.S.
Reuters reports on a new warning from the American Academy of Dermatology that a skin cancer epedimic is now underway in the U.S. More Americans and more younger Americans are being diagnosed with skin cancer.
One in five Americans will develop skin cancer, and a person's risk of the disease doubles if he or she has had five or more sunburns, according to a report in the April issue of the Mayo Clinic Health Letter.
Basal and squamous cell carcinomas, the most common and treatable types of skin cancers, had long been considered a problem only for people over 50, according to the report. But Mayo Clinic researchers found that the percentage of women under 40 with the more common type, basal cell, tripled between 1976 and 2003, while the rate of squamous cell cancers increased four-fold.
In the same study, the researchers found that just 60% of the cancers they identified occurred on skin frequently exposed to the sun, such as the head and neck, rather than the normal 90%. Most of the remaining cancers were seen on the torso. The researchers suspect this may be due to more widespread use of tanning beds.
Two types of ultraviolet (UV) light are implicated in skin cancers, the article explains. UVA, which penetrates deeper into the skin and impairs its immune defenses, is more responsible for melanoma, the most deadly type of skin cancer. UVB exposure causes sunburn, as well as squamous and basal cell skin cancers.
People are aware of the risks and another study provided an interesting addiction theory about why people continue to sun tan and use tanning beds despite the obvious cancer risk and aging caused by sun tanning. The article provided the following suggestions reprinted from an April 2006 Mayo Health Clinic newsletter.
Apply sunscreen 30 minutes before you are going to be outside, even if the weather is cloudy or hazy.
Spend as little time as possible in the direct sun between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Use about an ounce of sunscreen -- roughly a shot glass full -- and reapply it every two hours.
Always wear sunglasses and a broad-brimmed hat, and wear clothing made from tightly woven fabric to protect your skin.
Posted on April 20, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Human Bladders Grown in the Lab
The BBC reports that human bladders have been grown in the lab using cells from the patients.
US scientists have successfully implanted bladders grown in the laboratory from patients' own cells into people with bladder disease.
The researchers, from North Carolina's Wake Forest University, have carried out seven transplants, and in some the organ is working well years later.
The achievement, details of which have been published online by The Lancet, is being described as a "milestone".
The team is now working to grow organs including hearts using the technique.
The news was first reported in the Lancet. It is a promising technique that could be improve the quality of life for cancer patients. More long-term testing will be needed to make sure the bladders are safe. Let's hope the bladders are effective for long periods of time and that this same team can also learn to grow hearts and other organs.
Posted on April 6, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study Finds Cell Phone Brain Cancer Link
Reuters reports that a new Swedish study has found that long term use of cell phones does carry an extra risk of brain cancer -- especially on the side of the head where the phone is held.
The Dutch Health Council, in an overview of research from around the world, last year found no evidence radiation from mobile phones and TV towers was harmful. A four-year British survey released in January showed no link between regular, long-term use of cell phones and the most common type of tumor.
However, researchers at the Swedish National Institute for Working Life said they looked at the mobile phone use of 905 people between the age of 20 and 80 who had been diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor and found a link.
"A total 85 of these 905 cases were so-called high users of mobile phones, that is they began early to use mobile and, or wireless telephones and used them a lot," the study said.
"The study also shows that the rise in risk is noticeable for tumors on the side of the head where the phone was said to be used," it added.
The study was able to follow a long term use of mobile phones because mobile phones have been around for some time in Sweden -- since 1984.
Posted on March 31, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Kids Help Launch Online Health Community
The BBC has an inspirational story about some young kids that started a cancer and health youth community and resource. The kids all either experienced cancer or knew someone who suffered and died from cancer. The site is called Youth Health Talk and it allows people to read about teenagers with illnesses and communicate with their peers about their condition. Vishal Joshi, one of the site's founders, came down with cancer at the age of 14.
The inspiration for the site came from the experiences of a girl with cancer.
She had heard about the Dipex - the Database of Individual Patient Experience - site for adults which colleagues of her father ran, and wanted something similar for people her own age.
Sadly, she died before the site was completed, but staff have dedicated the cancer section to her.
Vishal, now aged 19, from Leicester, said knowing there were other teenagers going through the same problems as him would have made it easier.
"It is a really hard place to be," he explained.
YouthHealthTalk.org also includes video and transcripts of interviews with teens suffering from diseases that young people can read.
Posted on March 30, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Virus Might Cause Some Prostate Cancers
CNN reports the scientists have discovered that some prostate cancers may be caused by a virus. Scientists found a virus that is closely related to a cancer-causing mouse virus in some human patients with prostate cancer.
"It is a very exciting discovery," said Dr. Eric Klein of the Cleveland Clinic, who will present the findings Friday at an American Society of Clinical Oncology prostate symposium in San Francisco. "There is now a suggestion that prostate cancer could be caused by an infectious disease."
Infectious disease-causing viruses are already blamed for causing some liver cancers and cervical cancer. That has planted nagging suspicions in the minds of scientists that some diseases may play important roles alongside genetics, environment and chance in causing breast, stomach and several other forms of cancer.
Researchers are not sure how the virus infected people, but suspect it has been passed on genetically for thousands of years.
"This is a class of virus no one would have looked for in prostate cancer," said UCSF researcher Joe DeRisi, who developed the so-called "gene chip" that made the discovery. DeRisi's chip contains 20,000 snippets of vital genetic material from every known virus. It is the same chip that confirmed a previously undiscovered virus in the cold family that caused the SARS outbreak three years ago.
The scientists plan to expand the testing to see if more patients test positive for the virus. They also plan to conduct more studies to determine whether or not that is an actual link between the virus and human prostate cancer.
Posted on February 27, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Cancer Deaths Fall Slightly
MSNBC.com reports that data indicates cancer deaths fell for the first time since 1930 in 2003.
For the first time in more than 70 years, annual cancer deaths in the United States have fallen, a turning point in the war on cancer likely achieved by declines in smoking and better tumor detection and treatment.
The number of cancer deaths dropped to 556,902 in 2003, down from 557,271 the year before, according to a recently completed review of U.S. death certificates by the National Center for Health Statistics.
"Even though it's a small amount, it's an important milestone," said Dr. Michael Thun, who directs epidemiological research for the American Cancer Society.
There is much more to be done but as Dr. Thun said it is a milestone to see the numbers finally start to plateau and even recede slightly. The article also listed the deadliest cancers in 2003.
Lung: Men, 89,964; Women, 68,122
Colon, rectum: Men, 28,007; Women, 27,951
Breast: Men, 380; Women, 41,620
Prostate: Men, 29,554
Posted on February 14, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study Links Red Meat to Bowel Cancer
The BBC reports on a new study that has linked red meat consumption with damage to DNA damage and bowel cancer. The study found that people that ate two portions of red meat per day were three times a likely to get bowel cancer than people who ate red meat just once per week.
In the latest study the same Dunn team examined cells from the lining of the colon taken from healthy volunteers eating different diets.
They found higher levels of DNA damage in the cells taken from people eating red meat.
Work by the Open University team suggests the reason could be the presence of substances called N-nitrosocompounds, which form in the large bowel after eating red meat.
Their work suggests that these compounds combine with DNA, and alter it so that it is more likely to undergo harmful changes or mutations that increase the likelihood of cancer
Several experts and the Beating Bowel Cancer charity said the new study is more evidence of a red meat link to cancer while the UK's Meat and Livestock Commission downplayed the study's findings.
Posted on February 3, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
24-year-old Blogs to Prevent Skin Cancer
24-year-old Lee Jordan was shocked when a mole on his arm turned out be cancerous. Jordan decided to blog about his experience to help others learn about skin cancer and remember to check on their moles. On his blog Jordan writes: "I was recently diagnosed with a deadly form of Skin Cancer and I would like to take this opportunity to remind you to keep a check on your moles and consult your GP as soon as any noticable changes occur, left too late Melanoma when in its advanced stages is one of the most hardest cancers to treat .... Thank you for sparing the time to even stumble upon this blog."
The BBC offers this description of Jordan's melanoma in article.
The melanoma on his leg was 6mm in depth.
He knows that, because of the delay in diagnosis, his chances of surviving the next five years are 50/50.
"My Breslow depth (a method for measuring the depth of the tumour, used to predict a patient's chance of survival) for the mole on the back of my leg was off the scale. It came in at a whopping 6mm depth.
"It was because it was bleeding that my family pressured me to get it checked out, I really thought it wouldn't have been as serious as it was.
Hopefully, Lee Jordan will be okay and his blog will help other young adults learn to take skin cancer more seriously. The BBC article also linked to a couple useful UK skin cancer resources: Mole Aware and Cancer Research UK's Sun Smart.
Posted on January 5, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Cancer Spreads With Envoys
Scientists have made a significant breakthrough in how cancer metastasis to spread in the body. They found that cancer tumors send out envoys to prepare a new organ or tissue for infection. This will give scientists and drug companies a method for preventing cancer -- by targeting the envoys. An MSNBC.com article explains how the envoys work.
"The authors show that tumor cells can mobilize normal bone marrow cells, causing them to migrate to particular regions and change the local environment so as to attract and support a developing metastasis," Patricia Steeg, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, said in a commentary.
Cells at the site of the metastasis multiply and produce a protein called fibronectin, which acts like a glue to attract and trap the bone marrow cells to create a landing pad or nest for the cancer cells.
"These nests provide attachment factors for the tumor cells to implant and nurture them. It causes them not only to bind but to proliferate. Once that all takes place we have a fully formed metastatic site or secondary tumor," said Lyden.
"This is the first time anyone has discovered what we call the pre-metastatic niche."
The MSNBC article says the cancer needs the landing pad in place to be able to spread to the new organ. It seems logical that preventing these envoys and preventing new landing pads should keep cancer from spreading. But big questions remain like how frequently do cancer tumors send out envoys and how easily are the landing pads created? There are also questions as to what the differences might be among different types of cancer. But information is progress so this breakthrough should be welcomed as great news in the fight against cancer.
Posted on December 15, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Blogger Steve Rubel Completes Moh's Surgery
Steve Rubel has been blogging about skin cancer at
The Skin Cancer Blog.
The blog includes his own experiences with skin cancer. He just
went through moh's surgery and
blogged about his experience.
The procedure, in my case, was no worse than having a root canal
or tooth pulled. For others it might be more painful depending on
the location of the cancer. First the doctor drew a line around
the part of the skin where the growth is. Then she numbed me up
and removed a small section of skin. Off to the waiting room I went.
After about 20 minutes the word came back - negative. There was
no cancer. Does this mean I never had it? No. It means that most
was probably removed during the initial biopsy and the rest might
have been in the middle of the piece they cut out today. As the
doctor explained, the lab technician looks at the top of the
piece of skin they remove and the bottom to make sure there's
no cancer left. Once I got the good word, I went back onto the
table, gave me a bit more anesthesia and they sutured me up with a
bunch of stitches. My guess is that I received about ten stitches.
The result was good news -- the surgey went very well and the
cancer was removed. Steve's blog include some good resources
for avoiding skin cancer. Our last post on skin cancer has some
additional links.
Posted on November 16, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Steve Rubel Launches Skin Cancer Blog
Popular blogger Steve Rubel has launched the Skin Cancer Blog, which provides news and information about skin cancer as wel as links to skin cancer resources. Steve says he "founded this blog in 2005 after I was diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma -- the most common and curable form of cancer."
In addition to Steve's helpful blog there are daily news articles about skin cancer and websites like Skincancer.org which provide general information as well as information about the different types of skin cancer and how to prevent skin cancer. One sad fact about skin cancer is that many teens and twenty-somethings still sun tan or use tanning booths despite the fact that tanning and sun exposure increase a person's risk for skin cancer and wrinkles. A recent Herald Sun has more about young people's disregard for sun safety.
More than 1300 Australians die each year from skin cancer and those who use solariums are increasing their risk of the illness. Solariums emit ultraviolet rays up to five times stronger than the midday summer sun, information from the Cancer Council shows. Despite this, young people are flocking to tanning clinics particularly in the lead up to summer.
Associate Professor John Kelly from the Victorian Melanoma Service said an increasing number of his patients were frequent solarium users.
"These are people who are paying the ultimate price for fashion," Prof Kelly said. "The irony is that by making themselves look more attractive, they're actually putting their health at risk and causing premature ageing."
He said many Australians falsely believed solarium tanning was safer than sunbaking.
Posted on November 2, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Experimental Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer
USA Today reports that an experimental new vaccine has been developed that protects against cervical cancer. The vaccine targets specific types of the the human papillomavirus (HPV.
Scientists are reporting Friday that the vaccine was 100% effective in preventing cervical cancer and precancerous changes tied to two types of a common sexually transmitted virus.
"It's a very impressive finding," Christopher Crum, director of women's and perinatology pathology at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, said Thursday.
Cervical cancer is expected to kill 3,710 in 2005 so this is a very significant development in the battle against cancer. Both Merck and GlaxoSmithKline are working on cervical cancer vaccines. It will be interesting to whether any other cancers turn out to be caused by viruses in the future.
Posted on October 6, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Listeria Based Vaccine Stops Breast Tumors in Mice
Innovations Report has an article about a research team from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine has managed to stop the growth of breast tumors in mice using a cancer vaccine based on Listeria.
A team from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine has shown that by using a cancer vaccine based on the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes, they can cure mice with established breast tumors. Cancer vaccines, which are more properly described as immunotherapy, work by boosting an immune response against tumor-associated antigens. Using Listeria, the researchers, led by Yvonne Paterson, PhD, Professor of Microbiology, delivered the tumor-associated antigen HER-2/Neu to immune cells. HER-2/Neu is overexpressed in 20 to 40 percent of all breast cancers and also present in many cancers of the ovaries, lung, pancreas, and gastrointestinal tract. These cells eventually enlist killer T cells to seek out and destroy the tumor cells that display the HER-2/Neu molecule.
"We found that we can stop the tumor from growing out to 100 days, at which time we stopped measuring since this is a long time for experiments of this type," says Paterson. "The tumors stopped growing or went completely away." The researchers published their findings in the September 15 issue of The Journal of Immunology.
It sounds promising. Yvonne Paterson explained why she is excited about the idea of using Listeria to fight cancer tumors.
"It took a while to dissect what elements of an immune response were best able to cause the rejection of established tumors," she says. "But in the last couple of years it has paid off and we are very excited to see the technology finally being tested in cancer patients. The dream of the cancer immunotherapist is to provide an alternative and more humane way of controlling metastatic disease than current chemotherapies."
Posted on September 18, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study: Stress May Reduce Breast Cancer Risk
MSNBC.com reports that a study of over 6,000 women from Denmark found that a prolonged period of stress may reduce breast cancer by supressing estrogen production.
Scientists from Denmark drew their conclusions after studying 6,689 women over a period of 18 years, and speculated that it may be because daily stress suppressed production of estrogen, which is a risk factor in breast cancer.
"Prolonged-low key stress of everyday life results in a persistent activation of stress hormones which may impair estrogen synthesis and may therefore be related to lower risk of breast cancer," they wrote.
However, the scientists warned that this is not a cure for breast cancer and that stress is linked to other kinds of ailments.
However, they warned that stress was not a health cure, given that high levels had also been associated with increased risk of potential killers like heart disease.
They also noted that their findings were at odds with studies in Finland and Sweden -- the former found no link between daily stress and breast cancer while the latter found a direct association with higher risk.
Posted on September 12, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Is There a Sun Tanning Addiction?
Scientists trying to figure out why people continue to tan and increase their risk of skin cancer and wrinkles despite being aware of these risks. The BBC reports that one of the new theories being raised is that people have an actual addiction to sun tanning. A small study of just 145 people found that this could be the case but others dismissed the idea saying the benefit was a percieved social beneft rather than a chemical addiction.
However Colin Drummond, professor of addiction psychiatry at St George's Hospital Medical School, London, said: "I have concerns about calling everything in the world an addiction."
"There's a tendency to translate extremes of behaviour into addictions."
Professor Drummond said addictions meant a particular chemical mechanism occurred in the brain which determined a person's behaviour.
Such a mechanism had not yet been established for sunbathing, so the habit could not be labelled an addiction.
He said people tanned because they wanted to conform socially, not because they were addicted to the feeling.
Posted on August 17, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
More Young People Being Diagnosed With Skin Cancer
A study by May Clinic researchers has found an 74% increase in the reported number of basal and squamous cell carcinomas in people under forty since the late 1970s. Some of the data links this increase to sunbathing.
Mayo Clinic researchers studied only basal and squamous cell carcinomas, cancers that are almost always curable and that together afflict 1 million Americans a year, according to the article, published in today's Journal of the American Medical Association. The cancers, caused largely by overexposure to ultraviolet light from the sun, usually develop in older people who have spent many years outdoors.
In the study, doctors focused on people under 40 in Olmsted County, Minn. From 1976-1979 to 2000-2003, the combined rate of the two diseases grew from 19 cases per 100,000 people to 33 per 100,000 — a 74% increase.
Although up to 90% of such cancers typically appear on the head and neck, doctors in the study found 40% of skin cancers on other parts of the body, a change that probably reflects the effect of excessive sunbathing.
Leslie Christenson, a Mayo Clinic dermatologic surgeon, told the BBC that her findings link the increase to tanning. And while basal and squamous cell carcinomas are not usually fatal (1,000 - 2,000 deaths per year) they can be disfiguring.
Christenson says it's possible that some of the increase in basal and squamous cell carcinomas could be caused by increased screenings. But, she says, her findings suggest that tanning probably plays a more important role.
Basal and squamous cell carcinomas can be disfiguring, even if they rarely spread or turn fatal, Christenson says. And they kill about 1,000 to 2,000 people a year, the American Cancer Society says.
"For a preventable cancer, that's too bad," Christenson says.
Not only does tanning increase the risk of skin cancer but it also causes wrinkles. Staying away from tanning booths, avoiding the peak sun hours and wearing sun block are all good ideas if you want to keep healthy looking skin and reduce your risk of getting skin cancer.
Posted on August 10, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Scientists Hope to Kill Cancer Cells With Nanotubes
The Mercury News reports on a promising area of nanotechnology that could help fight cancer. Stanford University scientists are researching the idea of using nanotechnology to kill cancer cells. The idea, which is still several years away from human testing, uses nanotubes which can be heated up with a ultra-thin laser to kill cancer cells without harming healthy cells.
Dai and his team shine a very thin laser beam of near-infrared light on something called a carbon nanotube.
The electrons in the nanotube -- a hollow tube, resembling straw, made of interwoven carbon atoms about one-100,000th the diameter of a human hair -- become excited by the light and release energy in the form of heat.
The heat is so extreme that it is deadly to cells.
To test this approach as a therapy, Dai placed the carbon nanotubes inside a collection of cancer cells, then shone the three-centimeter laser beam on them. The cancer cells were destroyed.
``They were literally cooked to death,'' Dai said. ``The tube acts like a tiny heater.''
But cells without the carbon nanotubes showed no ill effects -- the light passes harmlessly through them.
Today's chemical and radiation cancer treatments damage or kill nearby cells so this method would be a way to micro-target the cancer and destroy just the cancer cells. The next move for the Stanford University scientists is to test the nanotube concept on mice with lymphoma.
Posted on August 6, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Study: Curry Fights Skin Cancer
CNN reports that a new study has found that curcumin, the compound in curry that makes it yellow, could help fight melanoma. The results were found after scientists tested curcumin on melanoma skin cancer cells and the lab. They also found curcumin helped stop breast cancer cells from spreading in mice.
Tests in laboratory dishes show that curcumin made melanoma skin cancer cells more likely to self-destruct in a process known as apoptosis.
The same team has found that curcumin helped stop the spread of breast cancer tumor cells to the lungs of mice.
Bharat Aggarwal of the Department of Experimental Therapeutics at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and colleagues treated three batches of melanoma cells, known as cell lines, with curcumin at different doses and for varying times.
The curcumin suppressed two proteins that tumor cells use to keep themselves immortal, the researchers write in next month's issue of the journal Cancer.
Posted on July 12, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
BBC Offers Extensive Cancer Resource
The BBC and Cancer Research UK are providing a cancer resource that provides facts about cancer as well as guides to the different cancers including bowel cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer skin cancer, stomach cancer, etc. The site also includes information about treatments like chemotherapy and radiology. The article says that one in three of us will be diagnosed with cancer during our life. Unfortunately, cancer is a disease that we do not know nearly enough about and that we don't have the best possible treatments for. The good news is that with the Internet consumers have access to more and more information and doctors and health researches can use the web to share research and hopefully come up with new discoveries and better treatments.
Posted on July 8, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Possible Bacteria Link to Oral Cancer Discovered
Reuters reports that that scientists think they have discovered that bacteria may play a role in the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral squamous cell carcinoma is a dangerous cancer that the American Cancer Society believes will kill over 7,000 Americans in 2005.
Three different types of mouth bacteria are associated with the most common form of oral cancer, researchers said Thursday in a discovery that may lead to a simple test for the often-fatal tumor.
The study, published in the Journal of Translational Medicine, also suggests the bacteria may play a role in causing the cancer, called oral squamous cell carcinoma, the researchers said.
"Finding bacteria associated with (oral squamous cell carcinoma) encourages us to hope that we have discovered an early diagnostic marker for the disease," said Donna Mager of the Forsyth Institute in Boston, who led the study.
The scientists still have to determine if the bacteria is actually causing the cancer or if the bacteria just grows more easily and quickly in the mouth once cancer is present. Bacteria and virus have been discovered to cause cancers. The Reuters article noted that Helicobacter pylori is a bacteria that can cause stomach cancers and that the human papilloma virus causes cervical cancer.
Posted on July 7, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Scientific Panel Links Teflon Chemical to Cancer
USA Today reports that a scientific panel says that a chemical called PFOA, which is used to make Teflon, is more likely to cause cancer than the U.S. government has previously indicated.
PFOA, or perfluorooctanoic acid, is a "likely carcinogen" according to an advisory board to the Environmental Protection Agency. The science panel's pronouncement is the first step in a process that could result in the agency regulating or even banning some uses of the popular manufacturing agent.
The independent science board disagrees with a risk assessment of PFOA that the EPA drafted and released earlier this year in which the chemical was described as a "suggested" carcinogen.
The article also says that cancer concerns are heightened by recent CDC studies that found PFOA in the blood of 95% of Americans. Scientists do not yet know how PFOA is getting into Americans' blood. The USA Today article also describes some of PFOA's uses:
PFOA is used in the manufacture of Teflon coatings on pans. It is also found in widely used coatings that make upholstery and clothing stain-resistant and in a grease-resistant coating on microwave popcorn and fast-food packaging among others.
Posted on July 4, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
Harmless Human Virus Could Kill Cancer Cells
Scientists have discovered that a harmless virus common to humans may help kill cancer kills. Reuters reported that scientists had success using the virus to kill HPV-infected human cells in the lab. Medical experts believe women can develop cervical cancer from the HPV virus.
He said at a meeting of the American Society for Virology that studies have shown women infected with AAV-2 who are also infected with a cancer-causing wart virus called HPV develop cervical cancer less frequently than uninfected women do.
AAV-2 is a small virus that cannot replicate itself without the help of another virus. But with the help of a second virus it kills cells.
For their study, Meyers and colleagues first infected a batch of human cells with HPV, some strains of which cause cervical cancer.
They then infected these cells and normal cells with AAV-2.
After six days, all the HPV-infected cells died.
Posted on June 22, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati
| |
|